As the excitement builds for Saturday's college football extravaganza with Northwestern and Illinois playing at Wrigley Field, the Chicago Tribune has decided to prominently feature a downer article by Steve Chapman stating the (way too obvious) reasons for demolishing Wrigley Field. The fuel for Chapman's desire to take a wrecking ball to Wrigley lies in his assertion that $300 million of government dollars is too much to give to a private organization (particularly with a crumbling resource) in this era of deficits and recession. Chapman also prominently lifts the success of the Cowboys and Yankees new facilities, but fails to mention the public financing that went into making those stadiums a reality. Finally, Chapman pisses all over his Chicago readers by proudly claiming that the last time he was at Wrigley, he was wearing a Cardinals cap. Dude, enough already ...
What Chapman and other Wrigley haters fail to realize is that Wrigley Field is an underutilized resource in an important northern neighborhood of Chicago. Tom Ricketts is actually doing a hell of a job giving the reasons why this $300 million is not money wasted (watch the two-part video below), but an investment in an important Chicago tourist destination as Wrigley Field is ranked third in the state of Illlinois in attendance numbers. In this "we need more jobs right now!" era, what better use of $300 million than to infuse Wrigley with some modern amenities, build the triangle building with a full kitchen for more gameday cuisine options, expand player/clubhouse resources, a museum and store that would remain open year-round -- along with (perhaps the best reason) the assurance that Chicago Cubs will continue to play at the now almost 100 year old Wrigley Field on Clark & Addison for the foreseeable future.
Although slowly changing for the better, ride the Red Line just a few stops north of the Addison stop and one quickly realizes what the Wrigleyville neighborhood could become without a prominent fixture like a major league ballpark. Even though the Ricketts family constantly assures Cubs fans that Wrigley Field would never be demolished on their watch, the realist in me quickly figures out that if the ballpark sunk to the poorest of conditions and had to be torn down, the possibility of a new, full-amenities ballpark being built on the limitations of the land that Wrigley Field now occupies would never happen. The Cubs would probably move further north -- way north -- like Gurnee or to a northwestern location at some convenient exit off of Interstate 90. Let's hope it never comes to that as old neighborhoods (and yes, Wrigleyville, even with the new construction, is an old neighborhood) need the foundations on which their communities are built. Wrigley Field anchors the north side of Chicago and will remain standing for my and your lifetime. Knowing this, let's all agree to limit any further conversations about demolishing Wrigley Field to the back pages of the Chicago Tribune, the discussion/comments sections of lame Internet sites and blogs like this one, and bars on the South Side. In the meantime, enjoy watching Wrigley Field get dolled up for football.
Watch the full 20 minute interview with Tom Ricketts after the jump to the next page. [Click to Continue…]
![Post image for Enough Already … [Why Wrigley Field Is Here to Stay]](http://miserablecubsfan.com/pics/2010/PurpleWrigley.jpg)






