As the excitement builds for Saturday's college football extravaganza with Northwestern and Illinois playing at Wrigley Field, the Chicago Tribune has decided to prominently feature a downer article by Steve Chapman stating the (way too obvious) reasons for demolishing Wrigley Field. The fuel for Chapman's desire to take a wrecking ball to Wrigley lies in his assertion that $300 million of government dollars is too much to give to a private organization (particularly with a crumbling resource) in this era of deficits and recession. Chapman also prominently lifts the success of the Cowboys and Yankees new facilities, but fails to mention the public financing that went into making those stadiums a reality. Finally, Chapman pisses all over his Chicago readers by proudly claiming that the last time he was at Wrigley, he was wearing a Cardinals cap. Dude, enough already ...

What Chapman and other Wrigley haters fail to realize is that Wrigley Field is an underutilized resource in an important northern neighborhood of Chicago. Tom Ricketts is actually doing a hell of a job giving the reasons why this $300 million is not money wasted (watch the two-part video below), but an investment in an important Chicago tourist destination as Wrigley Field is ranked third in the state of Illlinois in attendance numbers. In this "we need more jobs right now!" era, what better use of $300 million than to infuse Wrigley with some modern amenities, build the triangle building with a full kitchen for more gameday cuisine options, expand player/clubhouse resources, a museum and store that would remain open year-round -- along with (perhaps the best reason) the assurance that Chicago Cubs will continue to play at the now almost 100 year old Wrigley Field on Clark & Addison for the foreseeable future.

Although slowly changing for the better, ride the Red Line just a few stops north of the Addison stop and one quickly realizes what the Wrigleyville neighborhood could become without a prominent fixture like a major league ballpark. Even though the Ricketts family constantly assures Cubs fans that Wrigley Field would never be demolished on their watch, the realist in me quickly figures out that if the ballpark sunk to the poorest of conditions and had to be torn down, the possibility of a new, full-amenities ballpark being built on the limitations of the land that Wrigley Field now occupies would never happen. The Cubs would probably move further north -- way north -- like Gurnee or to a northwestern location at some convenient exit off of Interstate 90. Let's hope it never comes to that as old neighborhoods (and yes, Wrigleyville, even with the new construction, is an old neighborhood) need the foundations on which their communities are built. Wrigley Field anchors the north side of Chicago and will remain standing for my and your lifetime. Knowing this, let's all agree to limit any further conversations about demolishing Wrigley Field to the back pages of the Chicago Tribune, the discussion/comments sections of lame Internet sites and blogs like this one, and bars on the South Side. In the meantime, enjoy watching Wrigley Field get dolled up for football.

Watch the full 20 minute interview with Tom Ricketts after the jump to the next page. [Click to Continue…]

Todd Ricketts’ on Undercover Boss

Post image for Todd Ricketts’ on Undercover Boss

by MCF on November 10, 2010

Well, that was cute. If you are in need of a baseball/Cubs fix, then consider this little TV show. Undercover Boss had Todd Ricketts selling hot dogs, cleaning the bathrooms, preparing the field, etc. and the full episode is now up and ready for streaming (click here to watch). Todd claims that he went undercover because his brother, Tom, can't grow a beard AND to showcase the loyal workers at Wrigley. You're not going to learn much about the inner workings of the Ricketts family, but it does offer fabulous HD views of Wrigley Field in the summer! Again, you can watch the full episode by clicking here.

Watch a bonus interview with Todd Ricketts about his appearance and see some behind the scenes footage after the jump. [Click to Continue…]

Click to Get Ryno's JerseyDallas Green (currently the Senior Advisor to the General Manager of the Phillies and former Cubs GM) reportedly claims that Ryne Sandberg is bitter about the Cubs decision to go with Mike Quade as manager for 2011. As happy as I am about Quade remaining as manager, I am still (even a month later) somewhat surprised at Sandberg being passed over. I know that there are no guarantees in life, but from what I remember, Sandberg was basically assured the manager's job if he served his time in the minor leagues. He spent 4 seasons managing in that capacity (being named Manager of the Year in 2010), playing 15 years at the major league level (10 as an All-Star), and Ryno knows the rhythms and expectations of the Chicago Cubs.

So, why wasn't Sandberg made the manager with Mike Quade the bench coach? Is it basically assumed that Quade would have left for another team? If Sandberg were named manager, would Quade feel as bitter? Again, I am quite pleased with Mike Quade as manager, but I still find myself wondering why Sandberg was basically shown the door after being seemingly assured of the position.

Tom Ricketts talks about the new spring training facility being built in Mesa, how involved he was in the managerial search and how much influence he had in selecting Mike Quade, if he is satisfied with the job that Jim Hendry is doing, will they ever block traffic around Wrigley Field to close off streets for more of a pre and post-game party experience. Ricketts also discusses if the scoreboard will ever be upgraded or if a jumbotron video display ever be added in or outside the park. Also, answers if the payroll is budgeted for a late-season acquisition, Todd's appearance on Undercover Boss, his thoughts on Ryne Sandberg, and what it was like to watch the Giants and the fans celebrate after winning the World Series after a 50+ year drought.

The Afternoon Saloon with Carmen, Jurko & Harry on ESPN 1000
Interview Starts Right Away!
LISTEN OR DOWNLOAD - 2010-11-03- Tom Ricketts Interview

Marlon Byrd talks about what it's like to be a Cub, if he is pleased with Mike Quade as manager, how long it will take for the Cubs to be contenders again for the NL Central, what the Cubs need in the offseason, who he would like to see at first base in 2011, if it's tough to watch his former team, the Rangers, in the World Series, AND if the Rangers are mad at him because home field advantage was decided by Byrd's play in the All-Star game. [Click to Continue…]

Andre Dawson weighs in on the selection of Mike Quade over Ryne Sandberg, gives his impressions of Mike Quade, what advice he would give Sandberg, his thoughts on Carlos Zambrano, and finally The Hawk pimps his handyman supplies. [Click to Continue…]

Douchebag of the Week – Quade Qritiqs

Post image for Douchebag of the Week – Quade Qritiqs

by Dr. Douchebag on October 21, 2010

Dr. Douchebag returns after a one-season sabbatical.

The press conference had barely started--in fact, Quade hadn't even been named yet--before the usual douchebag Cubs "fan" critics started moaning and criticizing from their beer-addled positions in their bedrooms. He's the "cheap" option; Sandberg "deserved" the job; the Cubs might as well give up on 2011 now; etc.; etc.; etc. I'm not going to quote from individual comments splattered across what an old lady on BBC television the other day called "this w w w", but I'm guessing that most people reading this wee post have already read some of these kinds of responses already anyway.

There's two main things that make these kinds of critics (these qind of quade qritiqs) douchebags:

1) It's insulting to Mike Quade, about whom they know very little, which is to say, as much as everybody else outside the Cub organization. We've watched Quade coach third base for a few years, and we've watched him manage for six weeks (the only sustained period of the season in which the Cubs actually played decent baseball). While he wouldn't necessarily have been considered for the job without those six weeks, he didn't get the job just because of those six weeks. The man went through a rigorous interview process; also, the man had the vocal, public backing of his players, including important team leaders like Ryan Dempster, who was nothing short of effusive in his praise of Quade as a manager. Those of us in fan-and-blowhard-land don't know anything else about the guy, so it's hardly for us to say he's "the wrong choice" or that we're never going to watch the Cubs again (actually, I hope the people who say that do follow through on their threats, and cancel their Vine Line subscriptions, etc., because as I think this post makes clear, I think they're douchebags). Instead, one should consider responding in the thoughful manner of Sandberg-backer Al Yellon at Bleed Cubbie Blue. I, for one, am glad they chose Quade, and not Sandberg. I wouldn't have been able to bear a Sandberg failure, and I'm glad the sentimental aspects of Cubdom have been tamed for a change, in favor of rational decision-making. Sandberg will be under much less pressure if his first managerial job is a non-Cubs one; let his second or third managerial job be with the Cubs (after Quade has delivered a World Series ring, of course).

2) Presumably Quade was a cheaper option than Sandberg might've been, or Girardi almost certainly would've been, or Pinella or Dusty Baker were; so what? That might just leave extra money for the playing staff payroll, which might mean bringing in a better first baseman (for example) or starting pitcher than otherwise the Cub would've been able to. So the douchebaggery isn't just insulting, it's also short-sighted.

Anyway, the most important thing in all of this is that the Cubs have made a positive, progressive decision that should leave Cubs fans feeling good about the organization going into the offseason; the joy of being a fan is to watch your team do things well on the field, and the Cubs have made a first step in that direction already for the 2011 season. Carping and wailing about it because you've read some articles and you still feel sentimental about 1982-1994 (and probably 1996/97, too) makes you not a fan, but a douchebag.

So let's all go out and buy Mike Quade t-shirts.

In loving douchiness,

Dr. Douchebag

Brenly talks about some of the good things that are happening at the end of the season, why he removed himself from the running for Cubs manager, Tom Ricketts latest announcement that payroll will be decline over the next several years, the effects of Mike Quade's style and if he has an actual shot of remaining the Cubs manager for 2011, the tough question of what to do with Carlos Zambrano, and if anyone is going to beat the Phillies in the NL playoffs. [Click to Continue…]

Steve Stone Interview – “Having a Like-able Manager Rates Zero for Me”

October 1, 2010
Thumbnail image for Steve Stone Interview – “Having a Like-able Manager Rates Zero for Me”

After a couple of minutes of discussing the state of managerial changes around the league, Stoney finally talks Cubs baseball for a full 15 minutes. Stone talks about successful managers who are not considered to be player-friendly managers (Earl Weaver, Tony LaRussa, etc.), what to do about Carlos Zambrano (hint: Stone has never liked Big [...]

Read the full article →

Bob Brenly Interview – Why Brenly Is Not Interested in Being the Cubs Manager

September 30, 2010
Thumbnail image for Bob Brenly Interview – Why Brenly Is Not Interested in Being the Cubs Manager

I still think that Brenly undoubtedly really/truly/definitely wants the Cubs manager position, but he is realistic in his assumptions that the organization and the fans want Sandberg to be the manager for 2011. If you listen closely you can hear that reasoning as Brenly talks about “the cloud hanging over whoever is the next Cubs [...]

Read the full article →